“COVID, NATURAL IMMUNITY MORE EFFECTIVE THAN VACCINES”. Studies In Israel And The UK. PRO-VAX Experts In Italy And The USA
Unanimous chorus for natural immunological protection
Research by Maccabi Healthcare Services in Tel Aviv
UK Health Security Agenda report
Report to the US Congress by a Johns Hopkins lecturer
Publication of a biologist of the CNR in Italy
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
«Pharma tells us what to do and the CDC gets in line? Have we come to this?“. Starting from these questions last December 14, Dr. Marty Makary accused American public health officials of “modern McCarthyism” and of having published studies not worthy of “a seventh grade scientific experiment”.
The public health researcher and professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health told members of the House Select Committee (US Congress) on the coronavirus crisis that some COVID policies have become “too extreme, too rigid and are no longer guided. from clinical data “.
Makary focused on natural immunity and COVID booster shots for teens. He criticized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) haste to push booster for 16 and 17 year olds based on laboratory experiments which suggest that boosters increase levels of antibodies against Omicron.
Makary assured committee members that he is not “anti-vax” (he was vaccinated for COVID) but accused the CDC of knowingly publishing flawed studies so that people would get the vaccine, rather than waiting to acquire the vaccine. natural immunity by taking and and healing from the virus.
Let’s start with his words this journey through the scientific studies that demonstrate the great effectiveness of natural immunity against Covid-19, ignored by all Western governments to encourage the proliferation of Big Pharma vaccines such as Pfizer, sponsor even of the American attorneys general.
This is now confirmed by the official statements of two experts who we can consider PRO-VAX, because they are absolutely in favor of a vaccination in some sections of the population, but who are equally aware of the effectiveness of natural immunological protection, in many cases – we add – less dangerous than experimental gene sera that can interfere with DNA, as claimed by a geneticist from Cologne, or create phenomena of vaccine-resistance, as asserted by other famous biologists and virologists.
“MANY LIVES DESTROYED BY THE US GOVERNMENT”
“Many lives are being destroyed” by the government’s failure to recognize natural immunity, Makary said. The lecturer reminded committee members that, despite a combined annual budget of approximately $ 58 billion, neither the CDC nor the National Institutes of Health have produced credible studies on natural COVID immunity, something his research team is stating. undertaking, using private money.
The CDC released two studies earlier this year, claiming to show that vaccine immunity outweighs natural immunity. Those studies were so flawed that, according to Makary, they were “worse than a seventh-degree scientific experiment”.
We gave space to this complaint, reported with a lot of video by the American association Children’s Health Defense of the lawyer Robert F. Kennedy jr, because it has a disruptive value. In the first place, Professor Makary cannot be called a fanatic because he works for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health which is not only monitoring all cases of Covid-19 in the world but who even played a fundamental role in organizing there suspected Event 201 exercise of October 2019 in which the scenario of a devastating coronavirus pandemic was in fact heralded.
That event was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum by Great Reset theorist Klaus Schwab, but had as protagonist an important collaborator of Johns Hopkins: the lawyer Avril Haines, expert in biological weapons, former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency during the Obama administration and promoted to US National Intelligence Director by new president Joe Biden.
This observation, repeatedly referred to in the articles on theory of SARS-Cov-2 built in the laboratory in a plot of the New World Order implemented by China and the USA, it is important to understand the reliability of Professor Makary who works for one of the universities that ended up in the whirlpool of suspects of having contributed to creating the terror of the pandemic.
THE STUDY OF SCIENTISTS OF ISRAEL
«This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant».
This is the conclusion reached by the Israeli scientists Sivan Gazit, Roei Shlezinger, Galit Perez, Roni Lotan, Asaf Peretz, Amir Ben-Tov, Dani Cohen, Khitam Muhsen, Gabriel Chodick, Tal Patalon who work for prestigious research centers of Tel. Aviv such as the Kahn Sagol Maccabi (KSM) Research & Innovation Center, Maccabi Healthcare Services and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Tel Aviv University.
The study was approved by the MHS (Maccabi Healthcare Services) Institutional Review Board (IRB) and then published in the specialist medical journal meRxiv last August under the title: “Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity with immunity vaccine induced: reinfection against breccia infections ”.
«We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing three groups: (1)SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who received a two-dose regimen of the BioNTech/Pfizer mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine, (2)previously infected individuals who have not been vaccinated, and (3)previously infected and single dose vaccinated individuals. Three multivariate logistic regression models were applied. In all models we evaluated four outcomes: SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic disease, COVID-19-related hospitalization and death. The follow-up period of June 1 to August 14, 2021, when the Delta variant was dominant in Israel» the scientists write in the Abstract.
«The SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) risk of ‘breach’ infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected when the first event occurred (infection or vaccination) in January and February of 2021» the “breach” infection is that which affects the vaccinated despite the immunization process.
«The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected».
NATURAL IMMUNITY AND VACCINES IN THE UK
«UKHSA previously reported on the number of hospitalisations directly averted by vaccination. In total, around 261,500 hospitalisations have been prevented in those aged 45 years and over up to 19 September 2021. UKHSA and University of Cambridge MRC Biostatistics Unit previously reported on the direct and indirect impact of the vaccination programme on infections and mortality. Estimates suggest that 127,500 deaths and 24,144,000 infections have been prevented as a result of the COVID- 19 vaccination programme, up to 24 September» is what the UK Health Security Agency, the UK’s highest authority on health safety, writes in the conclusion of report 42 .
From this report, however, a disconcerting truth emerges which indirectly confirms the complaint of the American professor Makary on the faulty studies in relation to the natural immunity responses to Covid-19.
«Neither of these models will be updated going forward. This is due to these models being unable to account for the interventions that would have been implemented in the absence of vaccination. Consequently, over time the state of the actual pandemic and the no-vaccination pandemic scenario have become increasingly less comparable. For further context surrounding this figure and for previous estimates, please see previous vaccine surveillance reports».
UK pharmacovigilance reports are disturbing, as we have reported in the past. Not only those who get vaccinated run the risk of even lethal adverse reactions, such as a well-known e young BBC presenter killed by AstraZeneca vaccine, but it hasn’t no certainty of protection from contagion or death from a Covid-19 “breach” infection.
THE POWERFUL ANTIBODIES IN THE HEALED
«The Roche S assay that the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) uses for serological surveillance is fully quantitative, meaning that it measures the level of antibodies in a blood sample; an antibody level above 0.8 AU/ml (approximately one IU/ml using the WHO standard) is deemed positive. The PHE and UKHSA surveillance over the past few months has found that over 97% of the population of blood donors test positive for S-antibodies, which may have resulted from either COVID-19 infection or vaccination. With such high seropositivity, it is important to look at population antibody levels in order to assess the impact of the vaccination booster programme»
We read on page 24 in the same report 42 released by UKHSA which then goes into detail confirming the effectiveness of natural immunity.
«Figure 7 shows categorised Roche S levels in N-antibody positive individuals, those likely to have experienced past infection. Pre-vaccination antibody levels will be influenced by time since infection, variant and severity of infection, as well as personal factors such as underlying health conditions and age. At the start of the vaccination rollout in December antibody levels typically sat within the range of 0.8 to 1000 AU/ml, after vaccination antibody levels typically exceed 1000 AU/ml. Comparing Figure 6 with Figure 7, the overall higher profile of antibody levels in those who have experienced past infection is evident; both vaccination post infection and breakthrough infection following vaccination are expected to boost existing antibody levels».
«Researchers across the globe are working to better understand what antibody levels mean in terms of protection against COVID-19. Current thinking is that there is no threshold antibody level that offers complete protection against infection, but instead that higher antibody levels are likely to be associated with lower probability of infection».
ANALYSIS OF A GREEK RESEARCHER FROM THE ITALIAN CNR
«As for natural immunity, on the other hand, a study carried out in France showed that patients recovered from covid-19 continued to have circulating antibodies 13 months after infection and had a 96.7% decreased risk of contracting the virus again [12 ]. A study funded by the American National Institute of Health (NIH) and a study by the University of Texas have shown that healed subjects have pluripotent antibodies which are able to recognize different epitopes of the Spike protein, proving effective even against viral variants.   ».
This is what the biologist of Greek-Italian origin Panagis Polykretis, PhD in Structural Biology, currently working at the “Nello Carrara” Institute of Applied Physics, of the National Research Council (CNR), states, in a very interesting article published by the journal online The Independent.
«A further study showed that cured patients also have specific antibodies to other virus proteins, such as the N protein . It is therefore no wonder that an Israeli study (still in the validation phase), conducted by analyzing data from 673,676 people, has shown that vaccinated subjects are 13 times more likely to contract the Delta variant and 7 times more likely to develop symptomatic infection, compared to previously healed subjects . There is evidence that even subjects with asymptomatic infection have developed an equally functional immunity . It is correct to underline that all the aforementioned studies unanimously conclude that vaccination remains an important strategy to combat covid-19, effective in reducing the risk of hospitalization and death» adds Polykretis, referring to the research already approved by MHS (Maccabi Healthcare Services) but not yet from specialized magazines.
«There is sufficient evidence that natural immunity is more effective in decreasing the risk of infection, hospitalization and death for a longer period of time than vaccination. Caution. This absolutely does not mean that infection must be pursued to obtain natural immunity; such an unprepared action could have unpredictable developments, especially in subjects with comorbidities» warns the biologist of the Italian CNR who then attacks the duration of the Green Pass, recently reduced from nine to six months by the Draghi government.
«The fact remains that there is no logical and scientifically valid reason that justifies the duration of only six months of the Green Pass for healed subjects, since the data indicate a greater and more lasting efficacy of natural immunity. After six months, the recovered subjects should undergo a dose of the vaccine to prolong the validity of the Green Pass. This strategy takes a dose away from a subject who may really need it, to give it to an already immunized person. Furthermore, the results of two pharmacovigilance studies indicated that subjects with natural immunity have a higher risk rate of experiencing serious adverse reactions following vaccination, due to hyperimmune reactions and immunogenicity effects  ».
THE MASS MEDIA AGAINST IMMUNOLOGICAL TRUTH
“This too should not be a new concept for those who truly know immunology and should not be postponed to the next exam session. To conclude, I sincerely hope that the fact that subjects vaccinated for a few months can develop symptomatic infection, is not due to the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies, which could cause antibody-dependent enhancement phenomena (ADE), found in previous studies on SARS. CoV and MERS-CoV » recalls Professor Polykretis mentioning a problem highlighted by a previous study by two Chinese universities published in October 2020 before the experimental gene sera obtained emergency authorizations
«The mass media would not easily present the results of the studies I have reported in this article. In fact, anything that could interfere with the vaccination campaign is obfuscated: arguments such as efficacy, side effects and alternative therapies cannot be touched upon. However, scientific objectivity must be safeguarded. A mathematician, for example, has a scientific and moral obligation to continue to argue that the sum of 1 + 1 = 2, even if this result may not be acceptable to the rhetoric of the moment» scientist wrote.
«Anyone wishing to try to discredit the validity of this article is invited to a healthy scientific comparison and above all will have to be able to refute the results of the aforementioned studies» is the bitter conclusion of the biologist of the” Nello Carrara “Institute of Applied Physics.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
prohibition of reproduction without authorization
follow Gospa News in the Telegram