WUHAN-GATES – 57. New Manmade Lethal SARS-Cov-2 as BioWeapon. Fauci Behind “Madmen Scientists” of a Very Dangerous Experiment on Omicron
Former Trump Administration Health Advisor:
“These psychos again stitched together parts of other coronaviruses”
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Anthony Fauci has announced that he will leave the direction of the American NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) at the end of the year but seems to want to end his career, as a ‘sorcerer’s apprentice’ in biochemistry and coronavirus manipulator which began in the distant 2000 on an ancestor of SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) modified in the laboratory, with a “bang”.
A team of 14 scientists at Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories (NEIDL) developed a new strain of COVID-19 that killed 80% of the mice infected with the virus in a laboratory setting, according to a preprint study published Oct. 14.
Fauci, who ended up in the crosshairs of a judge for not revealing his secret emails with Big Pharma and the White House, (of which he is a councilor for the Covid-19 health emergency) aimed at censoring the unwanted effects of vaccines, has in fact two grants have been approved in favor of some scientists of a team for a very dangerous experiment supported by the Department of Biochemistry of the Boston University School of Medicine with the apparently harmless title “Role of spike in the pathogenic and antigenic behavior of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 Omicron”.
«In my opinion, the SARS-CoV-2 COVID virus we have on deck now is a bioweapon. Yet what these Boston researchers have done here and written out, is indeed an even more potentially deadly bioweapon, in the wrong hands» Paul Elias Alexander is a Canadian health researcher, and former Trump administration official in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic, wrote in a scientific article.
«This study was in mice, a rodent model, yet we run such pre-clinical studies in mice and based on results, we set the in vivo likely animal studies (including humans) based on the results. The results showed 80% mortality with serious disease in the lungs of the rodents. For anyone to claim that we should not be as alarmed with this rodent study, conducted in a BSL-3 facility yet deriving a BSL-4 chimera (handling BSL-4 pathogen in a BSL-3 lab), is uninformed, thin in expertise, and has no clue what they are saying. This chimeric virus could turn out to be far more dangerous to human beings than to the mice that died and can potentially escape into Boston and across the US, as well as globally. This study was a reckless dangerous mistake. This IMO is criminal behavior».
Dr. Alexander still states that he has a bachelor’s degree in epidemiology from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, and a master’s degree from the University of Oxford.
But above all he was the one who within the Trump administration, advocated a strategy of mass infection of the public with COVID-19 to strengthen herd immunity, as invoked by virologists Luc Montagnier and Geert vanne Bossche as they believed that “Vaccinating during a pandemic is a weapon of mass destruction”. But he also fought against administering anti-Covid gene sera to children.
BOSTON’S TERRIBLE RESEARCH
What Trump’s former consultant points out is explicitly confirmed by research published in the specialist medical journal BioRxiv in pre-print and led by scientist Da-Yuan Chen of the Boston Department of Biochemistry.
Here is the summary:
«The recently identified, globally predominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.1) is highly transmissible, even in fully vaccinated individuals, and causes attenuated disease compared with other major viral variants recognized to date. The Omicron spike (S) protein, with an unusually large number of mutations, is considered the major driver of these phenotypes. We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant».
«The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor-binding motif (RBM), yet unlike naturally occurring Omicron, efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells. In K18-hACE2 mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%. This indicates that while the vaccine escape of Omicron is defined by mutations in S, major determinants of viral pathogenicity reside outside of S».
«The majority of the chimera (stitching together parts of viruses or viruses etc.) research, at least the dangerous portion, was conducted at Boston University in Massachusetts, USA. The real question is why develop this hybrid strain? What is the value added of this? What purpose does this serve? I see none. Moreover, the blueprint to build this chimeric virus is now published in this Chen et al. pre-print paper. Can you think of the deadly consequences if malevolent bad actors decide to recreate this as a bioweapon?» Alexander further highlighted.
«This is Gain-of-Function (GoF) with enhanced pandemic possibilities and so it is technically illegal. I say it is illegal. This is very dangerous virus manipulation research and in a city or location near or in Boston? They should be barred from this work as it can get out and ravage societies. Who funded this insanity? We cannot even deal with what has happened globally with Wuhan legacy strain and we know that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) with EcoHealth Alliance (Daszak) and University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill) (Baric) were conducting the very same GoF research and we know the result. I just do not get this insanity they have with fooling around with the coronavirus and is it ‘just because I could’?».
The epidemiology scholar recalls referring to Ralph Baric’s experiments conducted thanks to funding from Fauci’s NIAID, the Pentagon’s military agency DARPA and the NGO EcoHealthAlliance of New York, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, during which, according to the dossier of the American doctor David Martin but also according to Russian genomics experts, the SARS viruses of 2003 and 2019 were created.
GoF is a biochemical technique to increase the viral potency of a virus with a dual use vaccine or bioweapon purpose. It is similar to the concept of enriching uranium for the creation of nuclear warheads.
THE SHADY DIRECTION OF FAUCI AND NIH
«So these psychos again stitched together parts of other coronaviruses (OMICRON today and Wuhan legacy that is long gone, parts of or complete viruses) and created a new potentially deadly, way more deadly variant. The question is why? Is anyone policing these crazy idiots? Is this bioweaponary? Who funded this insanity?» are the disturbing questions posed by Trump’s former health consultant.
The danger of this latest research on a chimeric recombinant built in the laboratory by enhancing the viral load of pathogens is similar to those that boosted SARS in 2003 by infecting it with HIV, as claimed by Montagnier and demonstrated by multiple experiments on the subject, from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2004 thanks to a grant from the European Commission chaired by Romano Prodi.
This is why it can be defined as a “dual use” experiment or aimed at the future realization of a vaccine for future variants of more dangerous Omicron or for the construction of a military bacteriological weapon to be used in the geopolitical field in light of the ever increasing tensions between NATO and Russia for the conflict in Ukraine, exacerbated by all types of sabotage …
In simple words, this study can be useful for the increase of a massive vaccination because the appearance of new, more serious forms of Covid-19, the American scientific community could proudly say “we had foreseen it”, taking care not to declare “we we did “as happened for SARS-Cov-2, prophesied by Bill Gates in 2015 and in 2018 by former CIA deputy director of the Obama-Biden administration, lawyer Avril Haines, promoted by Joseph Biden to director of the entire US Intelligence Community.
But let’s try to answer Dr. Alexander’s fateful question: “Who financed this madness?”.
The research acknowledgement reported: «We thank Dr. Yoshiharu Matsuura from Osaka University, Japan, for providing the pCSII-SARS-CoV-2 F8 plasmid; the Department of Public Health, Massachusetts, for providing the clinical specimen containing Omicron virus; and the ICCB-Longwood Screening Facility of Harvard Medical School for assistance with IF image acquisition and analysis. This work was supported by Boston University startup funds (to MS and FD), National Institutes of Health, NIAID grants R01 AI159945 (to SB and MS) and R37 AI087846 (to MUG), NIH SIG grants S10-OD026983 and SS10-OD030269 (to NAC), Peter Paul Career Development Award (to FD), and BMBF SenseCoV2 01KI20172A (AE) and DFG Fokus COVID-19, EN 423/7-1 (AE). We thank the Clinical & Translational Science Institute (CTSI; 1UL1TR001430) and Evans Center for Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research at Boston University School of Medicine for their support of the Affinity Research Collaborative on ‘Respiratory Viruses: A Focus on COVID-19’».
Schematic representation of CPER to generate recombinant SARS-CoV-2.
The SARS-CoV-2 genome was amplified into nine overlapping fragments. These fragments and a linker (containing a hepatitis delta virus ribozyme, a poly-A signal, and a CMV promoter) were treated with PNK to phosphorylate 5’ ends. The 5’-end phosphorylated fragments were then stitched together by CPER, and the nicks in the resulting circular DNA molecule were closed by treatment with DNA ligase. The CPER product was transfected into cells to rescue virus particles.
Alongside the aforementioned NIAID, there is also the NIH, the American National Institute of Health, which together with other subjects have funded the research conducted not only by Chen and other Chinese and American scientists from various US institutes (Cleveland Clinic Florida Research and Innovation Center , Port St. Lucie, FL, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Infectious Disease and Immunology Research Institute, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Chicago) but also by the Germans of the Institute of Clinical and Molecular Virology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
A synergy reminiscent of that between Pfizer and Biontech for the production of the dangerous anti-Covid Comirnaty gene serums.
A LETHAL CHIMERA FOR NEW VACCINES
«The interesting issue is that Pfizer and Moderna (and CEOs Bourla and Bancel) were already taking us to a very infectious and deadly sub-variant with their non-neutralizing sub-optimal gene injection whereby the virus (omicron) had become resistant (largely) to the non-neutralizing vaccinal antibodies. Yet these Boston researchers may have beaten Bourla and Bancel to the punch and gotten us there. God forbid this leaks out for as described, this chimera can get deep into the lungs and infect and cause deadly consequences» says Paul Alexander again..
And here is the phrase from the Boston research that unmasks the true purposes of the scientists although both Pfizer and Moderna have just fielded their updated anti-Covid vaccines at Omicron.
«Interestingly, while antibody-binding potential of Omicron spike is impaired, its receptor-binding capacity is intact. In fact, the Omicron RBD has higher affinity for ACE2 relative to the Wuhan-Hu-1 and Delta RBDs. This indicates that mutations in the Omicron spike have evolved in such a manner that they hinder antibody binding but preserve the receptor engagement. This opens up the possibility of targeting the conserved and structurally constrained regions of spike involved in ACE2 recognition for the design of broad-spectrum vaccines to control the current COVID-19 pandemic».
«This study provides important insights into Omicron pathogenicity. We show that spike, the single most mutated protein in Omicron, has an incomplete role in Omicron attenuation. In in vitro infection assays, the Omicron spike-bearing ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (Omi-S) exhibits much higher replication efficiency compared with Omicron».
«Not only is this chimera as infectious as omicron proper we have today currently circulating, but it is as pathogenic and deadly as the initial legacy Wuhan strain, yet now introduces a property that we had not seen before or did not dominate, this being lethal neurological involvement» doctor MD Alexander further added.
«While these mice develop lung pathology following SARS-CoV-2 infection, mortality has been associated with central nervous system involvement due to viral neuroinvasion. The fact that infection with Omi-S, but not with Omicron, elicits neurologic signs, such as hunched posture and lack of responsiveness, in K18-hACE2 mice suggests that the neuroinvasion property is preserved in Omi-S, and the determinants of this property lie outside of the spike protein».
These are the similar neurological complications that other research has recently associated with the toxicity of genetically modified Spike in gene sera. It should not be forgotten that Pfizer itself, in relation to the components of its vaccines, had confirmed that the “toxicology had not been thoroughly studied”. But let’s think carefully about the sentence of the study that we have already mentioned above …
«Interestingly, while antibody-binding potential of Omicron spike is impaired, its receptor-binding capacity is intact. In fact, the Omicron RBD has higher affinity for ACE2 relative to the Wuhan-Hu-1 and Delta RBDs. This indicates that mutations in the Omicron spike have evolved in such a manner that they hinder antibody binding but preserve the receptor engagement».
Here, therefore, are confirmed the theories of the late Italian biologist Franco Trinca, crushed by a really too lethal form of SARS-Cov-2 such as to suggest a bioweapon, which has repeatedly shared the alarms of Montagnier and Vanden Bossche about the risk that massive vaccinations with serums of new pharmacological technology could trigger ever more dangerous variants.
Variants that are circulating alongside who knows how many genotypes that the sorcerer’s apprentices have created in the laboratory, as also confirmed by the international study also signed by the virologist Giorgio Palù, president of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) regarding the genetic identity between SARS -Cov-2 is an artificial human gene built by Moderna in 2016.
That is made by the same Big Pharma of Cambridge (USA) which was able to patent an anti-Covid vaccine nine months before the discovery of the pandemic…
THE US BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
NEIDL (National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories), which conducted the research on Omicron chimera virus, describes itself as “a Boston University Center dedicated to research on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases and the pathogens that cause them,” and “a major step forward in advancing public health” that “provide[s] the necessary information and understanding to develop diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.”
University of Illinois international law professor Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., said the dangers of BSL-4 facilities have long been known, which is why he participated in efforts to stop the construction of the NEIDL facility.
Boyle, a bioweapons expert who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, told The Defender: “Years ago, there was a lawsuit to prevent and stop the building of this BSL-4 [facility] at Boston University that I did work on, and we failed.
“At that time we argued that the BSL-4 would engage in existentially type dangerous biological warfare research, and that was even before … gain-of-function. So, we knew from the get-go how dangerous this lab was going to be and tried to stop it. We tried, we failed, and now this Nazi biowarfare death science dirty work is going on.”
However, the Boston University facility was completed with $128 million in NIH funding.
Commenting on gain-of-function research in general, Boyle said: “You’ll note it was funded by NIH and NIAID under Tony Fauci.
“The New York Times has pointed out that about 94% of all this Nazi biowarfare death science dirty work has been funded by NIH and NIAID since Reagan put him in charge of NIAID.”
According to Boyle, this has resulted in more than $100 billion in federal bioweapons spending since Sept. 11, 2001.
Boyle said the federal government “doesn’t rein in or prosecute” scientists working on such projects, “because the federal government is paying for this type of Nazi biowarfare death science dirty work.”
Such research, and the facilities in which it is performed, also pose a risk to surrounding communities and the world at large, Boyle said, suggesting a Wuhan-like leak could occur at any similar facility in the U.S.: “This is another catastrophe waiting to happen, and that Boston University BSL-4 [facility] should be shut down immediately”.
“They know full well how existentially dangerous this is, certainly for the metropolitan Boston area … and especially for the African American community in Dorchester surrounding that Boston University BSL-4 lab.”
For Boyle, “It’s not enough to ban gain-of-function.” He also called for BSL-3 and BSL-4 facilities, including the Boston University facility, a CDC facility in Atlanta and a new facility in Kansas where the federal Plum Island Animal Disease Center is being relocated, to be shut down.
“The only remedy here is to shut down all BSL-3s and BSL4-s in the U.S.A., immediately and effectively,” Boyle said. “Otherwise, there is going to be another leak.”
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
prohibition of reproduction without authorization
follow Gospa News on Telegram
MAIN SOURCES
BIORXIV – Role of spike in the pathogenic & antigenic behavior of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 2 Omicron
3 pensieri su “WUHAN-GATES – 57. New Manmade Lethal SARS-Cov-2 as BioWeapon. Fauci Behind “Madmen Scientists” of a Very Dangerous Experiment on Omicron”