Update – LAST WARNING TO NATO BEFORE THE NUCLEAR WORLD WAR. By President Putin and Russian Ambassadors in US and UN
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Subscribe to the Gospa News Newsletter to not miss the most explosive investigations
Within NATO and especially the European Union, the allies have different positions on authorizing Ukraine to use cruise missiles on Russian territory.
But both the US and the UK, who feel safe from an immediate direct consequence of such war actions and want to use Europe as a battering ram, continue to push to formalize a diplomatic decision that could have a devastating impact and lead to the Third World War and the first nuclear one as clearly highlighted in the latest warning launched by President Vladimir Putin and the Russian ambassadors to the US and the UN.
The issue is more formal than substantial given that for months the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has been using American ATACMS (MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System) cruise missiles and the French-British Storm Shadow ones.
If these weapons have not given a significant gain in the conflict to the Kiev army it is linked to the fact that they were supplied by the countries of the Atlantic Alliance, including Italy, in decidedly limited numbers so as not to empty the arsenals. But also because they were used mainly on civilian targets – more vulnerable because they lack the anti-missile protection of the sophisticated Russian S-500 and S-400 systems – only to sadistically harm the population and cause a feeling of rebellion against Putin.
But the formal authorization would really be equivalent to a declaration of war by NATO on Russia and this is why it represents the red line with terrible consequences also in the Middle East and Asia, where Iran is just waiting for the right opportunity to take revenge on Israeli aggression and the dictator of North Korea Kim Jong-un is just waiting to test his arsenal on real targets.
Furthermore, as already highlighted by the dispatch of 11 Russian submarines near the coast of Florida and as announced by Russian diplomats, a nuclear conflict will not be limited to Europe but will inevitably involve the United States of America.
We are truly facing the last warning before a Nuclear World War.
Unfortunately, the mainstream media paid by the Weapons Lobby and many Westerners distracted by their daily selfishness do not want to grasp the immense danger that Brussels, Rome, Paris and Berlin run, easily reachable by a single international ballistic missile SARMAT that can carry up to 10 nuclear warheads directed at different targets and cannot be intercepted because it is fired beyond the Earth’s atmosphere and from there it falls, dividing into deadly atomic bombs.
ARTICLES FROM OTHER SOURCES
Putin issues new warning to NATO
Removing restrictions on Ukraine’s use of Western weapons would directly involve the US and its allies in the conflict with Russia and would be met with an appropriate response, Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned.
The West has sent Ukraine long-range missiles such as Storm Shadows and ATACMS, which Kiev has so far used against Crimea and Donbass. In the past several days, however, the US and UK have suggested they might allow these weapons to be used to strike targets deeper into internationally recognized Russian territory.
“We are not talking about allowing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory,” Putin said on Thursday. “It is doing so already, with unmanned aerial vehicles and other means.”
“This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European nations are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, considering the fundamental shift in the nature of this conflict, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats posed to us,” stated Vladimir Putin.
Ukraine lacks the capability to use Western long-range systems, Putin added, noting that targeting for such strikes requires intelligence from NATO satellites, while firing solutions can “only be entered by NATO military personnel.”
Moscow: “US can’t hide from nuclear war”
Washington will be unable to hide from a nuclear conflict if it starts across the ocean, Russian Ambassador to the US Anatoly Antonov has said. Fears of a potential escalation between Russia and NATO over the Ukraine conflict have been intensifying in recent days, as Western powers reportedly mull the possibility of allowing Kiev to conduct missile strikes deep in Russian territory.
Speaking with Rossiya 24 channel on Friday, Ambassador Antonov said that he is surprised at the “illusion” that “if there is a conflict, it will not spread to the territory of the United States of America.”
“I am constantly trying to convey to them one thesis that the Americans will not be able to sit it out behind the waters of this ocean. This war will affect everyone, so we constantly say – do not play with this rhetoric,” Antonov stated.
He also mentioned that while Western countries accuse Russia of “sabre-rattling,” the US wants to investigate the consequences a nuclear strike would have for Eastern Europe. Antonov was apparently referring to a study ordered by the US Defense Department to simulate the impact of a nuclear conflict on global agriculture.
According to a solicitation notice posted on a government procurement platform, the study will focus on regions “beyond Eastern Europe and Western Russia,” which in the simulation is the epicenter of the hypothetical nuclear attack.
Russian UN Envoy: “NATO countries would start an open war with Russia if they allow Ukraine to use long-range weapons”
Granting Kiev permission to use Western-supplied long-range weapons would constitute direct involvement in the Ukraine conflict by NATO, Russia’s envoy to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, has said.
NATO countries would “start an open war” with Russia if they allow Ukraine to use long-range weapons, Nebenzia told the UN Security Council on Friday.
“If such a decision is made, that means NATO countries are starting an open war against Russia,” Moscow’s envoy said. “In that case, we will obviously be forced to make certain decisions, with all the attendant consequences for Western aggressors.”
“Our Western colleagues will not be able to dodge responsibility and blame Kiev for everything,” Nebenzia added. “Only NATO troops can program the flight solutions for those missile systems. Ukraine doesn’t have that capability. This is not about allowing Kiev to strike Russia with long-range weapons, but about the West making the targeting decisions.”
Nebenzia: “NATO would become directly involved in military action against a nuclear power”
Russia considers it irrelevant that Ukrainian nationalists would technically be the ones pulling the trigger, Nebenzia explained. “NATO would become directly involved in military action against a nuclear power. I don’t think I have to explain what consequences that would have,” he said.
The US and its allies placed some restrictions on the use of their weapons, so they could claim not to be directly involved in the conflict with Russia, while arming Ukraine to the tune of $200 billion.
Multiple Western outlets have reported that the limitations might be lifted this week, as US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and British Foreign Secretary David Lammy visited Kiev. Russia has repeatedly warned the West against such a course of action.
Medvedev allows use of nuclear weapons by Russia when ‘patience runs out’
Russia does not use nuclear weapons in response to enemy attacks because it understands the danger and irreversibility of such a conflict, for now, Moscow is showing patience, but it may run out, Deputy Head of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev warned on his Telegram channel.
“What do Western leaders and their political establishment, which has gotten carried away with the war, think about our country’s reaction to probable missile strikes ‘deep into the territory’? Well, here’s what they think: the Russians talk a lot about responding with weapons of mass destruction, but do nothing. These are just ‘verbal interventions’. The Russians will not cross the line. They are just scaring. They don’t need a nuclear conflict, they can lose more, including the support of the Global South. Anyway, who needs the apocalypse? Well, and so on in the same way,” Medvedev wrote.
The politician underscored that no one really needs a nuclear conflict – it is “a very bad story with a very difficult outcome.”
“That is why the decision to use nuclear weapons (non-strategic or even strategic) has not been made so far,” he noted. “Russia is showing patience. After all, it is obvious that a nuclear response is an extremely difficult decision with irreversible consequences,” he said adding that “any patience comes to an end.”
MAIN SOURCES
NAZI NATO TAYLOR SWIFT:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sf0TL1IZ7w8