Vital – The Coronation of King Charles III Violates the UN Human Rights! The Heir can ascend the Throne only if he “Declares himself Protestant”. Other Faiths excluded
An eloquent expression from King Charles III during his coronation
by Carlo Domenico Cristofori
Charles III took the oath, inside Westminster Abbey, in front of the Archbishop of Carterbury, Justin Welby, placing his hand on the Bible.
“I, Charles, solemnly and sincerely profess in the presence of God, do testify and declare that I am a staunch Protestant and that, according to the true intent of the laws which secure the Protestant succession to the throne, I will uphold and maintain the aforesaid provisions to the best of my powers according to the law,” he said during the coronation ceremony.
The coronation is the formal investiture of a monarch with his royal powers and as head of the Church of England, according to a rite that is nearly a thousand years old. A purely symbolic and religious ceremony: Charles III has in fact been king since the day of his mother’s death, Elizabeth II,
«The aim of the ceremony, explains Buckingham Palace, is to make people reflect on the role of the sovereign today and look to the future, in a great event that celebrates the very idea of monarchy according to Charles III: leaner, more modern and more sustainable. Among the subjects of the kingdom, expectations exceed controversy» writes RAI News, the Italian national TV whose texts we quote only to highlight how servile the mainstream media are now to power.
Charles was thus crowned king together with his wife Camilla, married after the death of Princess Diana in a mysterious attack covered up by the Royal House on which disturbing ghosts of conspiracy still hover today.
Carlo and Camilla were officially engaged on February 10, 2005 and celebrated their civil wedding on April 9, 2005 in Windsor.
But the coronation of the King and Queen weighs an ethical boulder that no false rhetoric can move aside. A stumbling block that no mellifluous Western propaganda is ready to bow to the Sovereign of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of the other realms of the Commonwealth.
His proclamation violates one of the most important UN resolutions on religious discrimination. This did not happen when she was proclaimed Queen Elizabeth II as this pronouncement by the Assembly of the United Nations had not yet taken place.
Violation of the UN Declaration on Religious Discrimination
This is the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief (1981) approved on 25 November 1981 by the United Nations.
Charles Philip Arthur George can really consider this pronouncement of the United Nations waste paper by claiming for himself a hereditary throne that can only be conferred on an Anglican Christian and therefore not on any future Catholic, Muslim or Buddhist heir. We explained the details of the law and its violations against the UN pronouncement in detail in the previous historical investigation.
Gospa News was the only site in the world to raise an international diplomatic issue of enormous importance already when Charles III was proclaimed King of England. All the more reason do we raise him today when he assumes “the formal investiture of a monarch with his royal powers and as head of the Church of England”.
In the era in which the Biden administration is persecuting a Catholic hospital for a candle in honor of the Blessed Sacrament kept in the chapel, it seems to us that the problem needs to be posed within one of the most powerful states in the West which has welcomed and rewarded the intelligence and resourcefulness of the Muslims but will prevent them from becoming kings even if they are legitimate sons and converts of the ruler.
WEAPONS LOBBY – 6. Third World War Warnings! UK, Nato, US & Zelensky threaten Russia and China
We remain of the opinion that the Kingdom of England is the most precise operation of political extremism carried out by Freemasonry officially born in London in 1717 but already in turmoil long before.
Brief history of the son of Elizabeth II
Eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Philip of Edinburgh, he belongs to the Windsor house, which kept this denomination by royal decree even after her mother’s marriage. He is the first British monarch to be descended from Queen Victoria through two lines of succession: on his mother’s side, through Edward VII, George V and George VI, and on his father’s side through his grandmother, Princess Alice of Battenberg, Queen Victoria’s great-grandson.
He had two marriages: with Diana Spencer (1981), from whom he divorced in 1996, and with Camilla Shand (2005). He was Duke of Cornwall and Duke of Rothesay from 1952 and Duke of Edinburgh from 2021 until his accession to the throne in 2022.
He held the title of Prince of Wales from July 1958 until his accession to the throne on 8 September 2022, on the death of his mother.[6] He was heir to the British throne from 6 February 1952 to 8 September 2022, making him the longest-serving heir to the throne in the history of the British Isles, having surpassed King Edward VII, who was Queen Victoria’s heir to the throne from 1841 to 1901.
He is also the oldest King of the United Kingdom at the time of taking office (73 years), having surpassed King William IV (who ascended the throne in 1830 at the age of 64 years, 10 months and 5 days). But also what he saw the life of his wife Diana go out just when she was about to leave him with the risk of a terrible scandal.
The Mysterious Death of Lady D.
At the end of August 1997, Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed had spent a couple of days of vacation in Sardinia, aboard the yacht of his father Mohamed. The two left the island in the late morning of 30 August, deciding to stop in Paris before returning to London.
Diana and Dodi spent the night at the Hôtel Ritz, owned by the Al-Fayed family, where, however, they realized that they had been noticed by the paparazzi. Anticipating a large influx of photographers to the hotel, they decided to move into an apartment on rue Arsène Houssaye, also owned by Dodi’s father.
While a decoy car was being ushered out of the main entrance of the building to distract the paparazzi, the two, exiting from a secondary entrance, set off aboard a dark Mercedes-Benz S280 following the right bank of the Seine to reach the private apartment by Dodi. Noticing the escape of the two lovers, some journalists set off in pursuit of the car. To try to distance them, the driver of the car Henri Paul pressed on the accelerator.
The chase continued through various streets of Paris up to Pont de l’Alma: having entered the tunnel below, the driver lost control of the car, which crashed at the height of the thirteenth pylon.
On impact, Al-Fayed and the driver were killed instantly. Diana was still alive when help arrived and was loaded at 1:18 am into an ambulance, leaving the scene of the accident at 1:41 am and arriving at the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital at 2:06 am. Despite various attempts to save her, her internal injuries were too extensive and she was pronounced dead at 4:00 am. Trevor Rees-Jones, Diana’s bodyguard, was in a coma for ten days, remembering almost nothing when he woke up.
Conspiracy theories based on the assumption that Diana had been the victim of an assassination organized by British secret services were soon formulated about the incident. However, both the French and British police investigations concluded – obviously – that the accident was caused by a series of circumstances including the misconduct of the driver Henri Paul as the main cause of the crash.
However, we must remember that British intelligence MI 6 is suspected of having played an important role both in the coup in Ukraine and in planning the bombing of the Kerch bridge linking Crimea to Russia.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
prohibition of reproduction without authorization
follow Gospa News on Telegram
MAIN SOURCES
GOSPA NEWS – WEAPONS LOBBY DOSSIER
NATO’s COUP IN UKRAINE: THE GENESIS – 2. Obama, Soros, MI6 & Kyiv Security Forum
Un pensiero su “Vital – The Coronation of King Charles III Violates the UN Human Rights! The Heir can ascend the Throne only if he “Declares himself Protestant”. Other Faiths excluded”