The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for approving drugs and devices and monitors side effects caused by treatments. But the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on pandemic response and recovery, an influential group of MPs, has raised “serious patient safety concerns”. It has claimed that “far from protecting patients” the regulator operates in a way that “puts them at serious risk”.
The Chief Executive
Dame June said: “It has been an enormous privilege to have led the MHRA through a time of change which is unprecedented in UK medical products regulation. I am especially proud that during the last 5 years the Agency has built a new vigilance system, strengthened international and national partnerships, and delivered regulation which has enabled groundbreaking innovation, from gene therapy for sickle cell disease and the world’s first Covid vaccine, to being close to eradicating polio, and from medical device software to AI diagnostics.”
“It has been an honour to lead an agency which has patient safety as its top priority and makes a difference to the lives of everyone in the UK.”
“While I am stepping back from my MHRA role, I hope still to be involved in contributing to patient safety and public health in other ways.” Source
Clearly the Chief Executive is delusionaal the vigilance system was rendenred not fit for purpose under Raine’s watch, but she remained in the post for the five years ignoring the thousands of Covid jab deaths and harms. thus enabling their continuation. The Chief executive should not be anywhere near a public health role, but yes, she was right in saying that she “made a difference to the lives of everyone in the UK”
MHRA Aware of Heart and Clotting Issues Since March 2021
The Telegraph reported “Some 25 MPs across four parties have written to the health select committee asking for an urgent investigation. In reply, Steve Brine, the health committee chairman, has said an inquiry into patient safety is “very likely”.
In a letter to Mr Brine, the APPG said that there was reason to believe that the MHRA had been aware of post-vaccination heart and clotting issues as early as February 2021, but did not highlight the problems for several months.
Denmark and several other European countries suspended the AstraZeneca vaccine over clotting fears in March 2021, but the MHRA only published safety advice on April 7, by which time 24 million people had been vaccinated.
The watchdog also saw a “signal” for the heart problems myocarditis and pericarditis in February 2021, but did not include the conditions in safety updates until June 2021, MPs said.
“In effect, the MHRA licences medical products as safe knowing it lacks the processes to properly monitor adverse events,” the APPG wrote.
“In the case of Covid-19 vaccines, given the comparatively novel technology and record manufacturing speed, could the MHRA have even properly scrutinised the licensing data or known the short term safety?
“Now more than ever a wide-reaching and in-depth review is needed.”
Underestimates complexities
The group also warned that the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system – which encourages patients and doctors to flag-up medicine side effects – “grossly” underestimates complexities, and in some instances picks up just one in 180 cases of harm.
An analysis by Stockport NHS Foundation Trust found that in the North West of England, 1,058 people had been admitted to hospital with stomach bleeds caused by anticoagulant medication over five years, yet just six Yellow Card reports were made during the period.
Side effects from drugs account for one in every 16 hospital admissions in Britain, and cost the NHS more than £2 billion each year.
But trials are often too small to pick up adverse reactions, particularly when they are driven by rare genetic mutations, meaning it is vital to continue monitoring drugs in the community.
The MHRA recently said it would investigate why blood thinners were causing dangerous side effects in between two and five per cent of patients.
The APPG said it was also concerned that MHRA regulation of medicine was funded by the pharmaceutical industry and said the body had shifted from focusing on scrutiny to trying to help drugs get approved.
‘Watchdog to the enabler’
Dame June Raine, the chief executive of the MHRA, who announced she would be stepping down last week, has previously said the agency was transitioning from “watchdog to the enabler,” a phrase which MPs said warranted its own investigation.
Graham Stringer MP, co-chair of the APPG on pandemic response and recovery, said:
“The MHRA oversees a failing system that is slow to act, causing harm to patients and beset with conflicts of interest.
British Oncologist’s alert on Cancer Risk: “mRNA ‘Vaccines’ must be Banned once and for All”
“We cannot allow it to continue. That’s why we have written to the health select committee calling for an urgent investigation into the MHRA.”
The APPG said that concerns raised directly with the MHRA had been met with “an habitually dismissive and evasive response”.
Dame June said: “We have made significant steps to put patients at the heart of all our work.
“These include incorporating patient views and lived experience into our safety reviews; involving patients in the early stages of planning medicines development and building a new responsive reporting system for patients to tell us about any adverse incidents. We have also led on legislative changes to strengthen surveillance for medical devices and medicines, meaning patient safety is embedded firmly into law.
“Our progress so far in making changes based on meaningful patient involvement gives us a solid base to build upon as we continue on this important journey.”
“We are committed to enabling innovation that brings transformative medical products safely to patients.’’
From Dr. Tess Lawrie:
“If you have been harmed in any way by the Covid injections, you may wish to send June Raine a Notice of Liability before she leaves office. Raine received our urgent report on the Covid ‘vaccines’ in June 2021.
Despite this, she continued to enable the mass deployment of these inadequately tested, experimental and fundamentally unsafe Covid-19 injections without informed consent on the people of the UK, including on our little children, pregnant women and our most vulnerable” – Tess Lawrie.
by Patricia Harrity – originally published on The Exposé
All links to Gospa News articles have been added aftermath, due to the ties with the topics highlighted
WHOLE ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE ON THE EXPOSE’
LINKS MAIN SOURCES
GOSPA NEWS – WUHAN-GATES DOSSIER