On “Dominion” shady ballots-counter Trump Appeals to Supreme Court on “Clinton Software”, rejected by Texas

On “Dominion” shady ballots-counter Trump Appeals to Supreme Court on “Clinton Software”, rejected by Texas

36.954 Views

by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio

Versione originale in Italiano

“WE APPEAL”. It is the lapidary tweet of the incumbent President Donald Trump in response to the refusal of the Pennsylvania District Judge, Matthew Brann, to accept the appeal for the invalidation of millions of votes in the presidential election last November 3 after repeated reports of software errors. and alleged fraud in the counts.

In a statement signed by Giuliani and campaign legal adviser Jenna Ellis, the Trump campaign pledged to appeal Brann’s ruling, adding: “Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.”

Alea iacta est! The die has been rolled. No sentence is more adequate than that attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar when in 49 BC, in violation of the laws of the Senate, he crossed the Rubicon with his army, the small river on the border between Italy and Cisalpine Gaul, to move towards the conquest of Rome.

Trump’s action can become disruptive because, as we will see, it can stand on the unreliability of the Dominion vote counting software, adopted by numerous states during the administration of Barack Obama and promoted in other countries by the Bill Clinton Foundation so much that induce the most suspicious to consider it a manipulable system by the Democrats themselves. Also by virtue of the fact that it was rejected by Texas because of its poor reliability.

Donald Trump during the investiture ceremony of judge Amy Barrett appointed to Supreme Court

“If you count the legal votes, I win easily. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the elections from us, “declared the incumbent president in the famous speech censored by the mainstream media of NBC, CNN, NPR and MSNBC with an unprecedented move. So why hadn’t the White House run for cover before the election? Simple.

Because the fraudulent use of that machine or even just its use, being considered unreliable, would have offered the republican candidate, in the extreme case of an invalidation of the elections, the possibility of reconfirmation for electoral fraud or an exceptional temporary extension of the his office (never occurred in US history), notwithstanding the 20th amendment which prescribes his forfeiture at 12 noon on January 20 following the 4-year mandate.

In fact, it will be up to the Supreme Court to enter into the merits of the legal case but certainly the pronouncements of Amy Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas, two judges not only conservative but strongly opposed by the Democratic Party, will weigh like boulders. In the case of the second magistrate, even brought to trial by Biden himself on charges of sexual harassment which later proved unfounded.

A TRAP CALLED DOMINION

“Even assuming that they can establish that their right to vote has been denied, which they cannot, Plaintiffs seek to remedy the denial of their votes by invalidating the votes of millions of others. Rather than requesting that their votes be counted, they seek to discredit scores of other votes, but only for one race. This is simply not how the Constitution works,” wrote the judge Brann of Pennsylvania rejecting the Trump campaign lawsuit.

“Trump was counting on Giuliani’s presence to reverse the public narrative that the campaign’s legal drive to salvage the election was failing. Instead, Giuliani was mocked by legal commentators for being unprepared, unfamiliar with basic legal standards applicable to the case and even for forgetting the name of the judge” writes the online newspaper Politico which has openly supported Joseph Biden, the Democrat candidate for the White House, since the election campaign.

MEDIAs CROWN BIDEN PRESIDENT but Trump Not Give Up. The Gore’s case: president for only 37 days

Laughs best who laughs last. It comes to say by quoting a more popular proverb. Because from a careful analysis of this and other causes it is clear that Trump’s legal staff was waiting for nothing but a “casu belli” to bring the matter before the Supreme Court and open up a gigantic massive contestation of the entire American elections by refuting not the votes of this or that county wrongly attributed, as done in the six lawsuits in as many states, but, in all likelihood, the infamous Dominion system ended up in the eye of the storm on all counter-information media but also some mainstream internationals.

This could involve the risk of canceling the entire electoral consultation with the temporary reappointment of the current POTUS (President of the United States) office pending new elections to be programmed with a different technology. This is why in Pennsylvania there was a legal defeat of Trump but the trap that he and his loyalists had prepared with two disruptive moves also within the Administration has sprung.

MINNEAPOLIS REVENGE: Esper fired by Trump. New Pentagon’s Chief is Miller, former Green Beret

In fact, he first removed Mark Esper from the State Department, having ascertained his “wealkness” that could be conditioned by the media already on the occasion of the terrible clashes between Black Lives Matter and the Police in Minneapolis when he refused to send the army, and appointed him to lead the Pentagon Cristopher Miller, intelligence expert as director of the National Counterterrorism Center, but above all a Green Beret officer who left the uniform only 6 years ago and can therefore count on the good loyalty of the special department of the US Army. fired with a note of dishonor Chris Krebs by Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the State Department.

MINNEAPOLIS HELL with Soros’ Black Lives Matter & Antifa ISIS-Allies in NED-Deep State Plot vs Trump

“The recent statement by Chris Krebs on the security of the 2020 Election was highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud – including dead people voting, Poll Watchers not allowed into polling locations, “glitches” in the voting machines which changed votes from Trump to Biden, late voting, and many more”, Trump tweeted.

In the light of some detailed and important journalistic inquiries, one cannot help but share the doubts of POTUS, so much so that one even suspects that Krebs’ so superficial declaration is part of a skit created to attract the attention of those numerous media of mainstream that with blows of high-sounding articles seem to want to impose Biden on the White House in deference to the so-called Deep State.

US ELECTIONS IN THE HANDS OF DEEP STATE AND NWO

In fact, since the WHO declared the Covid-19 pandemic, a topic of clash yesterday and today between the two American presidential candidates, it is already spreading in many nations more permeable to the impositions of the World Health Organization, a true New World Order which is partly in the hands of Tedros Adenhamon Ghebreyesus.

Dr. Tedros went from political leader of the communist-Islamic guerrillas of the TPLF in Ethiopia (these days at war with the federal government) to WHO director general, as a “puppet” of Bill Gates, one of the main donors of the WHO but also of the Democratic Party in the USA, together with George Soros, coincidentally partner of a British who controls another multinational of the votes even more powerful than Dominion, of which we will write about in other reportages for reasons of shortness.

WUHAN-GATES – 24. WHO & Pandemic in Gates-China’s Puppet Hands: Dr. Tedros Leader of TPLF, Islamic-Communist Rebels blamed of Last Massacre in Ethiopia by Amnesty

Today I would like to reveal what my colleague Matthew Ehret, skilled investigative journalist, author on the geopolitics and military intelligence site Veterans Today (like myself) first reported but above all founder of the Canadian Patriot Review media which places him in a position privileged on the alleged Dominion scandal since the Vendor company, which owns the brand, is Canadian.

The computer manipulation of the vote is not science fiction as the Canadian journalist writes: «The single most important technique used in this entire business of vote fraud has come to light in the form of big tech-controlled voting machines and associated vote counting software which has come to dominate most elections around the world over the past 20 years which were exposed already 14 years ago in the 2006 documentary Hacking Democracy».

The web media of the Canadian investigative journalist Matthew Ehret

«The best entry point into the corrupt world of faked elections run by today’s deep state can be found in the case study of Dominion voting Systems, a Canadian owned company based in Colorado which dominates the American elections landscape. Currently, Dominion’s software is used in 30 states and brags that it serviced 71 million voters in 1635 jurisdictions in the USA in 2016» highlighted Canadian Patriot.

Among those states where this software runs the vote reading and counting, is included every single swing state now subject to recounts and court investigations such as Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

«On October 2-3, 2019, Dominion Voting Systems (“Dominion” or the “Vendor”) presented the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system for examination and certification. The examination was conducted in Austin, Texas. The following are the findings, based on written evidence submitted by the Vendor in support of its application for certification, oral evidence presented at the examination, and the findings of the voting system examiners as set out in their written reports» the Secretary of State of Texas wrote on 24 January. We skip the analysis pages and come to conclusions.

Texas’ refusal to adopt the Dominion system

«The examiner reports identified multiple hardware and software issues that preclude the Office of the Texas Secretary of State from determining that the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system satisfies each of the voting-system requirements set forth in the Texas Election Code. Specifically, the examiner reports raise concerns about whether the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system is suitable for its intended purpose; operates efficiently and accurately; and is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation».

«Therefore, the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system and corresponding hardware devices do not meet the standards for certification prescribed by Section 122.001 of the Texas Election Code. Accordingly, based upon the foregoing, I hereby deny certification of Dominion Voting Systems’ Democracy Suite 5.5-A system for use in Texas elections».

Failed without appeal! This is what emerges from the precious document cited in the Canadian Patriot Review investigation which does not pursue the sirens of the phantom server hijackings carried out by the American military in Spain and Germany, but is based on concrete facts.

THE RIDDLE ON THE SEIZED SERVER

To draw attention to bogus software, in a media pantomime proportionate to that of sectarian social networks such as Facebook and Twitter that would have obscured accounts and 300,000 messages in favor of Trump, the Republican deputy Louie Gohmert of Texas had thought of it, declaring that “forces of ‘ US Army” had seized servers from a Frankfurt office of software company Scytl.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=7fIZP37GLE0

Scytl is a Barcelona-based company (declared bankrupt in June 2020!) That provides electronic voting systems around the world, many of which have proven vulnerable to electronic manipulation. As reported by the blog of the journalist Maurizio Blondet in company would have had links between Soros and the Democratic party. Vulcan Capital, Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen, would have invested $ 40 million in Scytl. And Bill Gates would also own shares in Scytl.

The news was denied by the Associated Press, by managers of the company itself and also by the Pentagon which, in any case, to operate in a foreign country that is not a theater of war, under international law, should first rely on Interopol or all Europol and finally to the local police authorities. Therefore, the gossip seemed not very credible from its first point.

Cortisone Defeated Covid-19: Oxford confirmed Italian Neurologist’s Therapy Negleted. How many Deaths for WHO Faults?

In his remarks, widely shared on social media, Gohmert acknowledged that the information on the alleged raid came only from a “German tweet in German” and said: “I don’t know the truth”. But then he refused to answer the AP reporters.

The very probable hoax had been served and fed to those same social networks that had censored Trump’s entoruage trying to favor Biden, as if he were the chosen one to hold the reins of the most important military power in the world in the face of ghostly scenarios of a devastating economic crisis, but a direct consequence of the media and political terrorism created on the SARS-Cov-2 virus also thanks to the incorrect indications on the therapies given by the WHO and by the leader of the Ethiopian guerrillas Tedros, already on Gates’ payroll.

WUHAN-GATES – 22. Former CIA Pandemic’s Prophet in Biden’s Team. To manage for NWO Military Intel, AI, Big Tech and Trading in EU

The morsel, although poisoned by the absence of any slightest feedback, was swallowed by the network and spat out with violence and contempt everywhere. This has stumbled amateur bloggers but not professional journalists. For this reason, until today, when the plots have now been revealed, Gospa News has given up on pursuing the daily controversy over this or that contested vote.

THE DOMINION SYSTEM PAID BY CLINTON

The alleged and currently unfounded Scytl scandal has therefore also served to point the social beacon on the flaws in the Dominion system which are absolutely credible by virtue of some macroscopic counting errors such as in County Antrim in Michigan where 6,000 votes were initially attributed to the Democrats rather than the Republicans.

14 Thousand Jihadist Troops in Libya for Turkey Blitz alongside US Weapons’ Lobby, NATO’s Deep State & NWO

A trifle in the ocean of 70 million preferences per party and the gimmick of the Electors, but proof that that software is not as reliable as claimed by Texas. Nonetheless, the Bill Clinton Foundation, with the usual American excuse of promoting democracy in the world from which civil wars in Syria, Libya and Ukraine broke out, in 2014 spent over $ 2 million on the Delian: Democracy through Technology project!

«In 2014, Dominion Voting committed to providing emerging and post-conflict democracies with access to voting technology through its philanthropic support to the DELIAN Project, as many emerging democracies suffer from post-electoral violence due to the delay in the publishing of election results». read on Clinton Global Initiative.

The Delian project “Democracy through Technology” funded by the Clinton Global Initiative

«Over the next three years, Dominion Voting will support election technology pilots with donated Automated Voting Machines (AVM), providing an improved electoral process, and therefore safer elections. As a large number of election staff are women, there will be an emphasis on training women, who will be the first to benefit from the skills transfer training and use of AVMs. It is estimated that 100 women will directly benefit from election technology skills training per pilot election».

If they wanted to embark on a truly democratic project they should at least not have called it Dominion! Since it recalls the term of the British North America Act of 1867 to indicate the Canadian confederation (Dominion of Canada) established by this act and its condition of self-government within the British Empire. But also all the territories of the British Empire with political semi-autonomy before 1948; and even worse, the avenging angels against humanity in a macabre TV series inaugurated in 2014 in the US …

We will go into the specifics of the intrigues connected to Dominion, which intertwine in part with the complex background of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic, on other occasions. At the moment it is enough to point out that what has been written so far is at least sufficient to justify an effective serious investigation by the Supreme Court which could deal with the case within a few days and should still rule within 10 of the receipt of the case.

FROM PENNSYLVANIA TO THE SUPREME COURT

This is why the attorney Rudy Giuliani who protects Trump’s election campaign thanks the Pennsylvania judge for having spoken so quickly. Because the certification of the vote, which already took place in Georgia after a manual recount and in favor of Biden, is expected in many states with variable deadlines between 30 and 1 December. One thing that many perhaps ignore, in fact, is that until last night the republican tycoon was in fact in the lead in the electoral count as photographed in a graph by the New York Times. What does this mean? That in spite of the president-elect Biden, as defined by the media, the Electoral Committee of the 538 Electors will announce the winner only when all states have certified their results.

In the New York Times graph based only on states with already cetified votes Trump is ahead in the electorate

This means that the Supreme Court could rule, at least provisionally, before the data is certified and there is an official announcement of the winner thus allowing Biden, strongly benefited according to the exit polls and partial data not yet validated, to influence the public opinion and the judges themselves before a fait accompli.

So what are the possible scenarios? 1) the Supreme Court rejects the request, in order to avoid undermining the very credibility of Democracy, and paves the way for Biden’s apparent success. 2) the Court accepts the petition, orders the recounting under the supervision of independent authorities and the pre-judgments overturn the result in Trump’s favor. 3) the judges detect such serious anomalies in the counting system connected to the software as to invalidate the elections by arranging for the President of the Chamber to assume presidential powers pending the new votes. 4) the judges, while arriving at the same conclusions, temporarily extend the presidential mandate in derogation of the 20th amendment if there are also anomalies openly attributable to interference by the Democrats who control the House of Congress.

These are nightmarish scenarios since they have never occurred in the history of the United States of America. Because in the event that the constitutional dictates are followed and power passes into the hands of Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House and promoter of the impeachment on the smoky UkraineGate case against Trump, the latter could react strongly by appealing to an executive order of September 12 2018 on foreign interference in the elections, disputing precisely the fact that the Dominion company is Canadian.

UKRAINEGATE, CIA-DEEP STATE’S PLOT AGAINST TRUMP with two whistleblowers and Italian ties

«Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats said that after the intelligence community has found interference, there will be a 45-day period during which it will make an assessment and turn its findings over to the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice. If they agree there was interference, then sanctions will be imposed» reported than ABCNews.

Coats said the Trump administration wants to prevent, report and have a full assessment after the election “to ensure the American people exactly what may have happened or may not have happened, and if we see something then there’s going to be an automatic response.”

Coats last May, at the end of the interminable saga of UkraineGate wanted by the Deep State (by explicit admission of former director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan). He was replaced by John Ratcliffe as DNI.

THE NEMESIS JUDGE FOR BIDEN

It is therefore evident that an Inteligence investigation could also involve Democratic exponents and therefore unleash an unprecedented clash of powers with the risk that the violent street protests perpetrated in recent days by Black Lives Matter and Antifa especially when Trump fans MAGA (Make America Great Again) have peacefully invaded the streets of Washington, turning into real guerrilla warfare, so much so as to require the intervention of the army with the risk of igniting the fuse of a civil war.

US ELECTIONS. Mistakes, Mysteries and Civil War’s Nightmare. NYT contests FOX data. AntiTrump Rioters arrested in Manhattan and Portland

Everything will therefore depend on the Supreme Court made up of 7 members including three conservatives. Among them will have great influence of Amy Conney Barrett, nominated by POTUS recently despite strong resistance from the Blue, who is a fervent anti-abortionist Christian unlike the Dem candidate who is a progressive Catholic and therefore supports abortion as much as the LGBT community of which supports not only legitimate civil rights but also no-gender and transgender propaganda, even for children …

Lawsuit against Transgender Clinic for Children. Changed in Half-Male, Girl Accuses

Then there is Judge Clarence Thomas, 72, who risked seeing his appointment compromised on an allegation of sexual harassment which turned out to be unfounded. Born in Georgia he completed his education at one of the most prestigious Ivy League universities, Yale.

In 1991 it was Republican George Bush who appointed him an associate judge of the High Court. The hearing that preceded his appointment, however, opened a wide debate in the United States on unresolved issues related to gender and race.

Joe Biden, a Delaware senator at the time, was the head of the Senate Justice Committee. Crucial to the matter were allegations of sexual harassment brought against the judge by Anita Hill, a law professor who had worked briefly in the toga. The President in pectore rode the accusations made by the alleged victim but the trial ended in a stalemate due to the impossibility, for Biden, to track down further witnesses who could corroborate the claims of Anita Hill and prove, therefore, the illicit conduct of the judge.

Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas

“The case, which was later dismissed – allowing Thomas to become a High Court judge – raised a lot of controversy in the United States. According to the supporters of the toga, in fact, the orientation given by Joe Biden at the hearings – excessively flat on the unsubstantiated allegations of Anita Hill – was aimed at preventing a black judge from accessing the American Supreme Court. Twenty-nine years later, in fact, the toga is still in its place, a tangible sign of the brilliant career that the judge has been able to build”” writes the site Money.it which, however, casts doubts on the impartiality of the judge.

“Current circumstances, however, require serious reflection on whether Judge Thomas could be involved in the Trump-Biden dispute. Although twenty-nine years have passed, in fact, the story humanly marked the toga that, some time later, expressed his resentment towards the Democrat in an autobiographical book, My grandfather’s son” adds the site.

It is undisputed that they will have to pronounce themselves on objective facts but it is also clear that in thorny cases such as allegations of electoral fraud, every quibble can be legally gutted with greater or lesser attention. However, no one can be entitled to contest the impartiality of these judges at first, otherwise in any circumstance nearby or distant reasons for objection could be identified.

Instead, it is a sign of destiny, as a biblical passage recalls “For they sow wind and reap storms” (Hosea 8,7). It is not called the risk of impartiality. It is simply called: NEMESIS!

Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization – Versione originale in Italiano

MAIN SOURCES

GOSPA NEWS – GEOPOLITICS

GOSPA NEWS – WUHAN-GATES & CORONAVIRUS

GOSPA NEWS – OSINT INVESTIGATIONS

GOSPA NEWS – WEAPONS LOBBY

 

 

(Visited 1.466 times, 1 visits today)

Fabio G.C. Carisio

3 pensieri su “On “Dominion” shady ballots-counter Trump Appeals to Supreme Court on “Clinton Software”, rejected by Texas

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *