ZUCKERBERG AS HITLER: Legitimised Etnic Hate against Russians on FB. So Even 8 Years of NeoNazis’ Massacres in Donbass
The decision of the Meta tycoon
to remove the “hate speech” policy
also contested by the United Nations
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Can anyone tell me what is the difference between the seed of hatred propagated by the Nazi of Adolf Hitler towards the Jews compared to the one that Mark Zuckerberg has officially authorized to spread on the social platforms of Meta Facebook and Instagram towards Russia, and consequently of the entire Russian ethnicity?
The roots of evil are identical because they derive from the perverse and superb conception of being masters of absolute truth in judging the adversary considering him unworthy of being in the world but deserving of being censored, persecuted and killed as the Ukrainian Neo-Nazis have already done towards the Donbass Russians in the last 8 years, causing a “small” holocaust of 14 thousand dead.
The same censorship was applied by the European Union to the Russian media by the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen who has thus shown that she is faithful to the strategies of suppressing the freedom of expression and opinion of her German ancestors of the Third Reich. In fact, to seek peace in Ukraine you have also arranged the first military contribution of the European Union in its short and unhappy history.
But the extremist, radical and therefore terrorist attitude of Zuckerberg, which has been manifesting itself for years towards those who diverge from his ethical and geopolitical vision, appears to be sedimented in a pilot project of clouding and manipulation of mass thought.
Today is the news that the modification of META’s pollicy standards on the so-called “hate speech” has received official censorship from the UN (news at the bottom of the article). But it did not come from the general secretary Antonio Guterres, who instead rushed instead to denounce the horrors of the bombing of the hospital in Mariupol forgetting that for days the Russian envoy had reported that he had been evicted from patients and civilians but occupied by the neo-guerrillas. Nazis of the Ukrainian National Guard. The small reproach came instead from his spokesperson …
It is the usual hypocrisy of the most stubbornly useless body in the history of humanity but also occasionally dangerous: remember the case of the bribes in the Iraqi Oil for Food plan from which Saddam Hussein’s assassination mission arose precisely because in a spiral without end of corruption he dared to sell crude oil to Russian oil companies too (we will write a historical investigation shortly).
THE PERSECUTION OF FACEBOOK TO GOSPA NEWS
In her little Gospa News she began to be persecuted by Facebook since 2019 with regular blackouts and account blocks, until the closure of my two official profiles against which I unfortunately made a useless exposition to the Order of Journalists of Piedmont, only because it was a partner page of Putin’s Friends of Russia group, which was then closed overnight despite being the largest in Italy with about 45,000 members.
This happened only because there were the European elections and some national newspapers even went so far as to hypothesize that that Facebook group was responding to political propaganda managed by Russian intelligence infiltrators while we were only “four friends at the bar” – as Gino Paoli sang – ” who wanted to change the world … “. And above all the vision of it from a pluralist point of view.
Then my profiles were all deleted within a month because I dared to put my finger on the scourge of entrusting children taken from their families to gay couples for no reason in the scandal of the Angel & Devil investigation in Bibbiano (Emilia Romagna, Italy).
Then the harassment of the Zuckerberg clan began on the official Gospa News page because of the news about the SARS-Cov-2 laboratory virus, even when I published a report on the report of the US intelligence agencies to the US Intelligence Senate Committee.
ZUCKERBERG SPEAKER OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
The propensity to a sinister Russophobia of a part of the West had already come to light with the two bogus dossiers invented against the American President Donald Trump called RussiaGate and UkraineGate, which later turned out to be a colossal set of lies.
During the controversy over the impeachment procedure, a former Dem area director of the Central Intelligence Agency at least had the courage to admit the existence of that infamous Deep State that is synonymous with the New World Order.
Precisely in the political sphere, in order not to deny his biased orientation to the point of becoming criminal, Zuckerberg has financed the electoral centers of the states in the balance in the USA with about 400 million dollars to pilot the examination of the ballots during the presidential elections of the 2020 in favor of Democratic candidate Joseph Biden.
In a normal world he would have already been arrested …
How his accomplice in promoting the Masonic-Zionist New World Order, Bill Gates, would have been arrested in his dual role as the official financier of global immunization projects (of which Facebook was a partner in the suspicious Brussels summit of 12 September 2019) and of various Big Pharma vaccines.
But also as an occult sponsor of coronavirus research in Wuhan, thanks to contributions to the local university and the sponsorship of the New York EcoHealhAlliance of the scientist Peter Daszak, partner of the Wuhan Institite of Virology in the very dangerous 2003 SARS tests infected with HIV.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also funded a mysterious and suspicious Pirbright Institute research on lethal pathogens of various kinds including the 2003 SARS virus.
Inevitable, therefore, that Zuckerberg feels authorized to decide who to censor or whom to authorize to hate, having now become the international spokesperson for the New World Order of which Gates, George Soros and Klaus Schwab are the “managers” and majority shareholders representing the now overcharged. and out of the way Rothschild-Rockefeller and whose “political officials” are various characters such as the Democrat Joseph Biden (but also his republican version George W. Bush), Ursula von der Leyen, Emmanuel Macron and Sergio Mattarella.
THE NEO-NAZI MASSACRE OF THE RUSSIAN PHILOS IN DONBASS
The comparison with Hitler may seem risky as, for now, Zuckerberg has not yet directly moved military reprisals against the Russians.
But he has been complicit in the revolutionary political projects launched with urban guerrilla actions piloted by the secret services by his reference oligarchs since the coup in Kiev in 2014 orchestrated and financed by Soros together with the embassies of some NATO countries.
The protests in Maidan square in fact began in November 2013 thanks to the appeal launched on Facebook by an Islamic reporter who first took to the streets and, after the revolution, became first a parliamentarian and then deputy director of the national war industry of Ukraine: confirming that he was certainly very close to some military 007s such as those who hired mercenary snipers to shoot the crowd on February 20, 2014 resulting in the ousting of the legitimately elected Ukrainian president Viktor Yanucovych
But the owner of Facebook also legitimized the propaganda on all subsequent Russophobic actions: from the sanctions in Moscow for the annexation of Crimea (sanctioned by a popular plebiscite) to the outbreak of the current war in Ukraine germinated on the virus of hatred sown in Donbass by the Kiev government and its pro-Nazi mercenaries from the Azov Battalion.
They are not fanatics who have sprung up by chance within the Eastern European country but represent the natural heirs of the Ukrainian collaborators who were accomplices of the Fuhrer in the extermination of 1.6 million Russian Jews in Ukraine during the Second World War.
In this sense, there is a distressing continuity between the holocaust of the time and the one which in eight years claimed 14 thousand victims in the pro-Russian separatist republics of Lugansk and Donetsk and which could exaggerate tomorrow against the Russians on a world scale precisely because of the propaganda of hate legitimated by META-Facebook.
THE REAL FAULT OF RUSSIA: THE RETURN TO CHRISTIANITY
All this happened and happens only because the Communists sons of the Bolshevik Revolution financed by Western Freemasons, after the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary invoked by the Holy Father John Paul II who experienced on his skin the horrors of Nazism and Communism, wanted to rediscover the Christian roots already dear to the Tsars of the Romanov dynasty.
Tsar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra and their five children Olga, Tatiana, Marija, Anastasija and Alexei Romanov are saints for the Russian Orthodox Church outside Russia and for the Russian Orthodox Church (which also recognized them as “bearers of passion “). The family was executed on July 17, 1918 in Yekaterinburg by the Bolsheviks. She was then canonized in 1981 as a “new martyr” together with the servants killed with them: the court doctor Yevgeny Botkin, the boy Alexey Trupp, the cook Ivan Charitonov, the maid of the Tsarina Anna Demidova, two servants killed in September 1918, the company lady Anastasija Hendrikova and private teacher Catherine Adolphovna Schneider. All were canonized as victims of oppression by the Soviet Union.
The rebirth of Christianity is the real fault of Moscow and of Russian President Vladimir Putin, as Patriarch Kirill of the Orthodox Church has clearly highlighted. Because this denial of Masonic atheism now rampant in the West represents a powerful and insurmountable ideological obstacle to the worldwide spread of theosophical relativism, dear to Hitler as much as to the current Catho-Freemason leaders of the NWO, which is the indispensable cultural humus for the imposition of a totalitarian social tyranny, as foreseen by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, which I believe to be quite similar to that of the SS.
On the basis of these historical and moral assumptions, the military operation of the new Tsar of Orthodox Christianity aimed at de-Nazifying becomes understandable and even justifiable: however much the invasion appears to us Christians to be excessively aggressive and vehement. Precisely for this reason Monsignor Viganò, Apostolic Nuncio Emeritus of the Catholic Church in the USA, highlighted that Putin has fallen into a well-set NATO trap and has called for a truce towards peace.
But Putin’s fury is motivated by the fact that, from 1998 to today, despite having been at the head of one of the countries with the most powerful war arsenal, he has almost only made defensive wars of the allies (Syria and Libya before Donbass) unlike the multiple conflicts triggered by NATO.
Only the ignorant of contemporary history do not know these things because in the middle of their vain life they are interested in the world for a maximum of 5 minutes a day through the news programs piloted by Atlanticist journalists of the NWO mainstream.
Only the indifferent for 8 years have had their hearts completely deaf to the lament of the children killed in Donbass in a war that began in 2014 that today could also end quickly if only the Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelenski had not received the mandate from the New World Order to to destroy his country and its people in order to inflame the culture of hatred against Russia.
This is why Zuckerberg has come to legitimize ethnic hatred on social media as Hitler did.
This is why the Tsar of Moscow could also be compared to one of the terrible knights described in the Apocalypse of St. John functional to the evangelical prophecies to unmask the False Prophets and the true Antichrist and therefore make the Parousia inevitable: the return of the Risen Jesus Christ on earth. .
UN blasts Meta for allowing hate speech against Russians
Originally published by Russia Today
The United Nations has condemned the move by Meta to allow hateful remarks and calls for violence against certain Russians, with Stephane Dujarric, the spokesman for the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, stating that the international body does not condone such calls coming from any side.
“We stand clearly against all hate speech, all calls for violence. That kind of language is just unacceptable from whichever quarter it comes from,” Dujarric said during a news briefing on Friday.
Meta, meanwhile, tried to downplay the impact of its controversial move, with the social media giant’s President for Global Affairs and former British Deputy PM Nick Clegg releasing a statement to clarify the decision. The main goal of the platform was to enable Ukrainians to vent their anger over the Russian offensive, he claimed, describing the decision as a “temporary” measure.
“I want to be crystal clear: Our policies are focused on protecting people’s rights to speech as an expression of self-defense in reaction to a military invasion of their country. The fact is, if we applied our standard content policies without any adjustments we would now be removing content from ordinary Ukrainians expressing their resistance and fury at the invading military forces, which would rightly be viewed as unacceptable,” Clegg stated.
The policy will be applied only “in Ukraine itself,” he went on. It was not immediately clear whether residents of other countries would be allowed to express their “fury” and call for violence against Russian troops and President Vladimir Putin as well, or whether the hateful content would be available for viewing outside Ukraine.
There is no change at all in our policies on hate speech as far as the Russian people are concerned. We will not tolerate Russophobia or any kind of discrimination, harassment or violence towards Russians on our platform.
Last month, Facebook revised its policies against dangerous individuals and organizations, allowing posts praising the Azov Battalion, Ukraine’s National Guards unit, that incorporates hard-line nationalists and openly neo-Nazi fighters.
The latest change in Meta’s policy was first reported by Reuters on Thursday, citing internal emails from the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. While the agency originally claimed the platform allowed hate speech against all the Russians, it later toned down its article, explaining the measure related to “invading Russians” and Putin only.
The move has invoked fury in Russia, where Facebook was banned a few days ago over discrimination towards state-owned and state-affiliated Russian media outlets. Russia’s media watchdog Roskomnadzor targeted Instagram, with the platform set to go online on March 14. The Prosecutor General of Russia went even further, asking a court to outlaw Meta Platforms as a whole, designating it as an extremist organization.
The label would effectively put Facebook and Instagram in one row with actual terrorist groups, invoking the same penalties and restrictions. Using Facebook or other Meta platforms in good faith, however, would not be automatically considered an act of extremism, Ekaterina Mizulina, a member of the Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation, a body advising Russia’s government on civil society issues, has explained.