9-11 WTC Hidden Explosions: Lawyers, Architects & Intel Experts Fighting for Truth against Deep State

9-11 WTC Hidden Explosions: Lawyers, Architects & Intel Experts Fighting for Truth against Deep State

2.238 Views

by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio

Versione originale in Italiano

«Plaintiffs fail to state a claim that they are entitled to the grand jury records that they seek. As to the presentment of the Amended Petition to a grand jury, Plaintiffs have not articulated a harm sufficient to satisfy standing requirements. Additionally, Plaintiffs fail to state a claim that they have a First Amendment right to directly petition the grand jury. Accordingly, this case must be dismissed».

This is the answer with which on May 8, 2020 Alexander J. Hogan, Assistant Attorney of Geoffrey S. Berman, US Attorney of the Southern District of New York who submitted it, refused to open an investigation focused on Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry Petition to U.S. Attorney to Report Federal Crimes to Grand Jury.

With formal and non-substantive reasons, the Department of Justice Attorneys rejected the request for new investigations into the destruction of the World Trade Center complex that occurred during the attack of the two planes hijacked by Islamic terrorists on Tuesday 11 September 2001: in particular on what Richard Gage, AIA (American Institute of Architect) defines the “smoking gun”, or rather the mysterious collapse of building 7, not hit by aircraft such as the two Twin Towers.

American architect Richard Gage, founder of the Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth organization

But the non-profit organization Lawyers’ Committee on the occasion of the 19th anniversary of the most serious and hidden massacre in contemporary history is ready to reply with a live video conference that promises to be really hot because it will have two excellent speakers of National Security.

American Lawier Francis Boyle

This is Francis Boyle, human rights lawyer and professor at the University of Illinois who drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the US Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.

Boyle further was the first to blame the Covid-19 virus as a bio-weapon built in laboratory as did former British counterintelligence director MI 6 Richard Dearlove later.

CORONAVIRUS – 10. The Plot in 100 lines: from CIA Bio-Weapons to New World Order Prophecy

At the conference, planned since 3 pm on Sunday 13 septmber on Lcfor 911 website, will also take part William Binney, a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency. Binney is an outspoken critic of illegal domestic surveillance programs and is the creator of Thin Thread – a surveillance system that would protect US Citizens privacy rights.

William Binney, former agent of the National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower

It is not yet known what the speech of the two experts in law and intelligence convened by the Bar Committee for 9/11 will focus, which is chaired by David R. Meiswinkle, criminal lawyer, retired police officer for 23 years and former veteran of the United States Army.

WUHAN-GATES – 12. MI6 British Intelligence former Head: “SARS-2 Built in Bio-Lab”. Pics and Proofs of HIV Tests

However, it seems certain that this association is ready to give battle to shed light on the truth that remained buried under the “ground zero” where 2,977 people died but above all remained hidden in those documents that disappeared or were never revealed despite numerous requests including that of another organization at the forefront: that of “Architects & Engineers for 9-11 (AEfor911Truth)” which supports the legal initiatives of lawyers and has launched fundraisers to support the actions of some of the relatives of the victims who united in battle.

«The family of Geoffrey Thomas Campbell — a British man who was killed in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 — today announced that they will submit their petition for a new inquest later this fall» reads on September, 9, 2020 in AEfor911Truth website.

Geoffrey Campbell, died in 9/11 WTC disaster with his mother

Their decision to postpone the filing of the petition from the originally planned date of September 11, 2020, is due to the emergence of additional new evidence that needs to be further developed as well as the scheduling constraints of some expert witnesses.

«As we mark the 19th anniversary of that horrible day, the Campbell family is more confident than ever that the true cause of Geoff’s death will finally be established in a court of law — paving the way for real 9/11 Justice».

On the one hand there are the multiple evidence exhibited by them in relation to multiple explosions prior to the impacts, also highlighted in the numerous reports on the World Trade Center massacre by Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff, international intelligence expert.

Twin Towers hit by planes hijacked by Islamic terrorists on 11 September 2001

On the other hand, there is the Deep State rubber wall within the institutions they deem sufficient the conclusions of the judicial and congressional inquiries sufficient and do not deem it necessary to further investigate. Among these is the District Court of the District of Columbia which on October 2, 2019 dismissed the civil suit brought by the Lawyers Committee against the Federal Bureau of Investigation in March 2018 in reference to the alleged omissions in the investigation.

But just in the past few weeks, the curt response of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has also arrived in relation to the report on the “smoking gun” which according to architects and engineers would be evidence of a controlled explosion.

Without claiming to want to write in a single article an exhaustive reconstruction of what happened in September 2001, in honor of the victims, however, we want to report the contents of the legal actions and some important revelations disseminated in recent years by Veterans Today, so that readers ask themselves if “The plaintiffs did not articulate sufficient damage to meet the legitimacy requirements” as argued by the New York prosecutors who closed the case.

 

LAWYERS COMMITEE PETITION

«In the Petition, the Lawyers’ Committee explains that the U. S. Attorney is legally required to present the evidence submitted to a grand jury» we reads on complaint summary. .

«The 52-page Petition, accompanied by 57 exhibits, presents extensive scientific and eye-witness evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC buildings on 9/11, including:

1) Independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries in the form of thermite or thermate (TH3 military variant of the other – es).

2) Testimony of numerous New York firefighters who were 9/11 First Responders that they heard sounds of explosions and saw explosions on 9/11 at the WTC resembling controlled demolitions, and some reported seeing molten iron like in a foundry.

3) Testimony and scientific analysis by numerous architects, engineers, physicists, and chemists which demonstrates conclusively that the WTC Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 were brought down by use of explosives and incendiaries, not by airplane impacts or the resulting jet fuel and building fires.

4) Expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts, and prior to the building collapses.

«The Petition presents scientific reports and testimony explaining that the documented presence of molten iron proves that temperatures were present at Ground Zero much higher than those that jet fuel and building contents could create when burned, extreme temperatures consistent with use of the high tech explosive and incendiary materials called thermite and thermate – wrote Lcfor9/11 – The Petition also presents scientific reports and testimony explaining that the presence of previously molten iron microspheres, which have been established as present in the WTC dust in large quantities by electron microscope analysis of WTC dust samples, by both government and independent scientists, is scientifically impossible based on the burning of jet fuel and office contents alone but would be expected from the use of thermite or thermate».

«Video evidence is also presented that shows the ejection during the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 of heavy steel elements laterally some distance from these WTC buildings which would not be possible from a gravity-driven collapse. In addition, the Petition notes that scientific analysis, eyewitness testimony, and government reports confirm sulfidation and high temperature corrosion of the steel found in the rubble after the collapse of the WTC towers and WTC 7, a phenomenon not expected in a jet fuel fire and gravity-driven collapse but consistent with the use of thermate».

 

BUILDING 7, THE SMOKING GUN MISTERY

It is precisely on the mysterious collapse of building 7, the smoking gun of the hidden conspiracy, that the attention of “Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth” has focused, asking NIST for detailed information.

«Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is sorely disappointed to report that on Friday, August 28, 2020, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued its initial decision denying the request for correction that we — together with ten 9/11 family members and 88 architects and structural engineers — submitted on April 15, 2020, regarding NIST’s 2008 report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7».

«Our request described in meticulous detail eight items of information in NIST’s Building 7 report that violated the federal Data Quality Act and NIST’s Information Quality Standards. Our goal was to compel NIST to rectify these violations and in so doing reverse its unsupported conclusion that fire was the cause of Building 7’s collapse» added in a statement AE911Truth.

«Even a cursory reading of NIST’s letter, prepared by the staff of the Engineering Laboratory headquarters, reveals NIST’s response to be a blatant avoidance of the arguments and facts contained in the request, written with the intention of misleading the uninformed reader into believing an adequate response has been provided» added architects.

«For example, NIST’s only response to the first claim in the request is to describe the position of a key girder and column in relation to each other at room temperature — implying that lateral displacement and walk-off of the girder was possible from this position — when NIST knows full well that what matters is the position of the girder and column in relation to each other at the elevated temperatures claimed by NIST. Even NIST’s own analysis shows that at elevated temperatures the girder would have expanded and become trapped behind the column’s side plate, thus preventing the girder walk-off that is alleged to have initiated a progressive collapse of the building».

 

LAWSUIT AGAINST FBI

It would be interminable to report in detail all the contents of the architects’ press release and therefore we point out the link while we focus on the considerations of the same association regarding the action against the FBI rejected by the District Court of Columbia.

«The FBI 9/11 Review Commission Lawsuit is complex litigation against the federal government comprising a number of phases that could last up to two years. The end goal is to compel the FBI to reconstitute its 9/11 Review Commission in some form, assess the evidence known to the FBI but omitted from the Commission’s 2015 report, and include that evidence in a new, amended report to Congress and the American people» wrote AE9/11Truth.

«For the first time ever, 9/11 family members and advocates are taking legal action against the FBI aimed at forcing the Bureau to assess and report the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition as well as other unaddressed 9/11 evidence – we reads on Lawyers’ Commiteee for 9/11 – In 2015, the FBI released the final report of its 9/11 Review Commission. Congress mandated the Commission to conduct “an assessment of any evidence now known to the FBI that was not considered by the 9/11 Commission related to any factors that contributed in any manner to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.”

However, the report did not include an assessment of evidence related to the WTC demolition nor an assessment of several other areas of evidence known to the FBI.

But the Columbia District Court rejected the case despite too many still open questions raised even by intelligence sources as reported by Gordon Duff on VT which largely fit perfectly with the theories of lawyers and architects.

To understand it, just listen to three minutes of the video recorded for SGT Report and published on YouTube on 23 March 2019 regarding the legal action against the FBI. From the tenth minute onwards, architect Richard Cage not only refers to the famous “smoking gun” but talks about connections with the Saudis and with Israeli Mossad agents.

 

THE NUCLEAR DEVICES IN BUILDING 7

It would be too complex to reconstruct the multiple connections in this reportage and therefore we limit ourselves to recalling some salient passages published by Veterans Today.

«The destruction of Building 7 was the result of nuclear devices installed in 100 gallon Halon fire extinguishing tanks placed throughout the complex under a fire prevention equipment upgrade program, according to the US Department of Energy report» wrote Duff on October, 5, 2016.

«There is and has been evidence of Saudi Arabian involvement, even in the limited false narrative published in the 2005 9/11 report or the supposed missing “28 pages.”»

«Real reports also show Mohammed Atta, the former Egyptian security officer, then with Saudi intelligence, to have been an operational planner operating from his rented apartment in Fort Lee. Where the cover-up hits home is that Atta was under surveillance by a team tasked with investigating nuclear terrorism against the US.

The Secret History of 9/11

 «This team, originally headed by FBI special agent John O’Neill and later by FBI special agent Mike Dick, which was to include nuclear weapons specialist Jeff Smith, was centered in Fort Lee, New Jersey, not just to watch Atta but to watch Atta and his accomplices, which included Israeli teams who used a safehouse only blocks away. Photo broadcast by Fox News listing Special Agent Mike Dick as “armed and dangerous,” claiming he was threatening to assassinate FBI officials.

This is the subject of the real investigation and the records of this, seized by the Department of Homeland Security, and held for release after 50 years, tell a wider story, one that involves Israel deeply at every turn, along with traitors in the Pentagon.

What we can do now is open doors for legal counsel going after Saudi Arabia. Without what is here, no counsel will be able to even be denied documents outlining witnesses and evidence that, according to the popular fictional narrative, do not exist» concluded Gordon Duff.

 

EXPLOSIONS WITNESSED BY 36 REPORTERS 

In July, 2020 the same AE911Truth released a very interesting interview.

«On this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, Ted Walter and Graeme MacQueen join host Andy Steele to talk about their newly published paper, “How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11.” At more than 12,000 words and with 80 separate news clips from 9/11, the paper sheds new light on how the media reported the Twin Towers’ destruction before the official narrative set in».

Ted Walter is the director of strategy and development at AE911Truth. He holds a master of public policy degree from the University of California, Berkeley. He’s the lead author of Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says about the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7.

UN SG Hammarskjold Killed Twice by DEEP STATE. UK Intel Hinders the International Inquiry

«Well, basically this paper is the result of Graeme and I watching about 70 hours of news coverage from September 11, 2001, and presenting the results of what we found. We compiled what we could find on the internet, continuous news coverage from about 11 different channels, ranging from the major networks to cable news to the local channels in New York City — basically, all the news organizations that had reporters on the ground at these various networks» told Walter.

USTICA MASSACRE: THE NATO SHADES ON US – FRENCH AIR FIGHTERS

« And what we found was that, overwhelmingly that — I guess we say the great majority of the reporters who were there who witnessed the event, perceived it to be an explosion or an explosion-based event. And then the reporters who were on the ground talking about it in the minutes and hours afterwards, referred to it as an explosion or other terminology that’s suggestive of it being an explosion-based event. And we actually found a very small number, a very small percentage of the reporters who were reporting events in New York City, not mention explosions in their reporting».

“Beirut Massacre for a Missile!”. Lebanon President and Italian Military Expert said. “Thermal rings the proof”

But the geopolitical alliances between the US, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Israel are too influenced by that Deep International State which, through an apparatus of financial, judicial and military powers, is able to hide the truth for decades.

As happened in Congo for the plane crash in which the UN Secretary General Dag Hammarskjold died, as happened for the Ustica massacre in Italy or the recent explosion on Beirut Port for an alleged Israeli nuke attack. Too many secrets to uncover, too many balances to subvert to give truth and justice to thousands of victims.

Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization


MAIN SOURCES

GOSPA NEWS – OSINT INVESTIGATIONS

GOSPA NEWS – WARZONES REPORTS

GOSPA NEWS – JIHADISTS REPORTS

 

 

 

(Visited 389 times, 1 visits today)

Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *